Limitation of Legal Proceedings against the Government Act, 1972

Jurisdiction
Eswatini
Citation
Act 21 of 1972
Date
1 December 1998
Language
English
Type
Legislation
Download
Download PDF (179.5 KB)
eSwatini

Limitation of Legal Proceedings against the Government Act, 1972

Act 21 of 1972

  • Assented to on 7 August 1972
  • Commenced on 18 August 1972
  • [This is the version of this document at 1 December 1998.]
An Act to prescribe limitations of time in connection with the institution of legal proceedings against the Government.

1. Short title

This Act may be cited as the Limitation of Legal Proceedings against the Government Act, 1972.

2. Limitation of time in connection with the institution of legal proceedings against the Government of Swaziland

(1)Subject to section 3 no legal proceedings shall be instituted against the Government in respect of any debt—
(a)unless a written demand, claiming payment of the alleged debt and setting out the particulars of such debt and cause of action from which it arose, has been served on the Attorney-General by delivery or by registered post:Provided that in the case of a debt arising from a delict such demand shall be served within ninety days from the day on which the debt became due;
(b)before the expiry of ninety days from the day on which such demand was served on the Attorney-General unless the Government has in writing denied liability for such debt before the expiry of such period;
(c)after the lapse of a period of twenty-four months as from the day on which the debt became due.
(2)For the purpose of subsection (1)—
(a)legal proceedings shall be deemed to be instituted by service on the Attorney-General of any process of a court (including a notice of an application to court, a claim in reconvention, a third party notice referred to in any rules of court and any other document by which legal proceedings are commenced) in which the claimant of the debt claims payment thereof;
(b)a debt shall, if the Government prevents the claimant thereof from coming to know of its existence, not be regarded as due before the day on which such claimant becomes aware of its existence;
(c)a debt nor arising from contract shall not be regarded as due before the first day on which the claimant thereof has knowledge that the debt is due by the Government or the first day on which he could have acquired such knowledge by the exercise of reasonable care, whichever is the earlier day;
(d)a period prescribed in such subsection shall, in the case of a debt of which the due date is postponed by agreement between the Government and the claimant, be calculated afresh as from the day on which the debt again becomes due.

3. Non-applicability

(1)Section 2 shall not apply in respect of—
(a)a debt for which the Government has unequivocally in writing acknowledged liability to the person instituting legal proceedings in respect of such debt;
(b)a counter claim in any legal proceedings instituted by the Government;
(c)a claim under the Motor Vehicle Insurance Act, No. 19 of 1946;
(d)a claim in respect of which any of the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act, No. 4 of 1963 apply.
(2)Section 2(1)(a) shall not—
(a)affect the issue of a rule nisi against the Government during such period of ninety days.
(b)apply to any urgent application made to court during the period referred to in such period of ninety days.

4. Granting of special leave

(1)The High Court may, on application by a person debarred under section 2(1)(a) from instituting proceedings against the Government, grant special leave to him to institute such proceedings if it is satisfied that—
(a)he has a reasonable prospect of succeeding in such proceedings;
(b)the Government will in no way be prejudiced by reason of the failure to receive the demand within the stipulated period; and
(c)having regard to any special circumstances he could not reasonably have expected to have served the demand within such period:
Provided that the Court in granting such leave may impose such conditions as it deems fit (including the payment of any costs) and notwithstanding section 2(1)(c) stipulate the date by which such proceedings shall be instituted.
(2)The High Court may, on application by the Government, and if it is satisfied that Government has a reasonable prospect of succeeding in such proceedings, on good cause shown, grant special leave to extend the period of ninety days referred to in section 2(1)(b):Provided that the Court in granting such application, may impose such conditions as it deems fit (including the payment of any costs), and at the same time shall extend the period of twenty-four months referred to in section 2(1)(c) to such extent as it may deem fit.

5. Provisions of Act to be raised in Court

(1)A court shall not of its own motion take notice of a failure to comply with sec-tion 2 or with any conditions imposed by the High Court under section 4(1).
(2)In the event of a person who has instituted legal proceedings against the Government having failed to comply with section 2 or any conditions imposed by the High Court under section 4(1), the court in which the legal proceedings have been instituted may on application made by the Government before or at the time of lodging its plea or any other documentary reply to the claim against it, dismiss such proceedings:Provided that such court may allow the Government to make such application at any other stage in such proceedings if it is satisfied that—
(a)the Government could not have reasonably been expected to have invoked such section before or at the time of the filing of its plea or other documentary reply; and
(b)no prejudice will be suffered by the person who has instituted such proceedings which could not be cured by a suitable order of costs against the Government.

6. Transitional proceedings

This Act shall not apply to legal proceedings in respect of a debt which arose before the commencement of this Act.

7. Repeal

Any law which is inconsistent with this Act is hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency.
▲ To the top

History of this document

18 August 1972
Commences.
07 August 1972
Assented to.
Cited documents 0
Documents citing this one 21
  1. Dlamini v Simelane and Others (1162 of 1998) [1999] SZHC 58 (1 January 1999)
  2. Dlamini v The Ministry of Justice and Constitutional Affairs and Another (1945 of 2003) [2005] SZHC 68 (8 July 2005)
  3. Dlamini v Umbutfo Swaziland Defence Force And Others (27 of 2001) [2002] SZSC 27 (10 June 2002)
  4. Fakudze v Attorney General (1075 of 2002) [2006] SZHC 62 (7 April 2006)
  5. Gimson Gamedze v The Principal Secretary Ministry of Public Works and Transport and Another (94 of 2014) [2018] SZHC 139 (5 July 2018)
  6. Gumedze v Registrar Of The High Court And Others (353 of 2013) [2013] SZIC 28 (27 September 2013)
  7. Khumalo v Attorney General and Another [1997] SZHC 26 (5 February 1997)
  8. Mahlalela v Umbutfo Swaziland Air Force and Another (3292 of 2006) [2007] SZHC 160 (25 May 2007)
  9. Masuku v Swaziland Government [1999] SZIC 7 (20 May 1999)
  10. Mavimbela v Attorney General (2965 of 2000) [2006] SZHC 66 (11 April 2006)
  11. Mndzebele v Ministry Of Agriculture And Others (394 of 2012) [2013] SZIC 6 (1 March 2013)
  12. Motsa v Attorney General [1999] SZHC 88 (7 June 1999)
  13. Myeni v The Commissioner of Police (3064 of 2007) [2017] SZHC 258 (14 December 2017)
  14. Ngwenya and Another v Commissioner of Police and Another (36 of 2006) [2006] SZHC 56 (17 March 2006)
  15. Shabalala v Swaziland Government (2618 of 1995) [2002] SZSC 23 (7 June 2002)
  16. Swaziland Aviation Management Services (Pty) Ltd v Ministry of Public Works and Transport NO and Others (666 of 2005) [2008] SZHC 140 (1 July 2008)
  17. Swaziland Government Gazette dated 1978-06-16 number 893
  18. Umcebo Mining (Pty) Ltd v USA Distillers (Pty) Ltd (1890 of 2012) [2017] SZHC 202 (5 October 2017)
  19. Ziyane v Umbutfo Swaziland Defence Force and Another [1997] SZHC 19 (24 January 1997)
  20. Zwane v Attorney General and Another [2004] SZHC 168 (20 October 2004)
  21. Zwane v Attorney General and Another (2689 of 2003) [2004] SZHC 134 (20 October 2004)