- Flynote
-
Application for interim interdict – whether requirements for interim
order were met – whether the appellant should have brought a separate prior
application to institute the application – leave had been sought – no requirement
for separate prior application for leave – requirements for intervention by
additional appellants were met - requirements for interim interdict met – appeal
succeeds
Loading PDF...
This document is 370.6 KB. Do you want to load it?
Cited documents 3
Judgment 1
1. | Mostert and Others v Nash and Another (604 of 2017) [2018] ZASCA 62 (21 May 2018) | 5 citations |
Legislation 2
1. | Pension Funds Act, 1956 | 1515 citations |
2. | Disaster Management Act, 2002 | 1216 citations |